Welcome

Having gathered quite a bit of information about Moore's Supreme and Awesome runs, I decided to create a home for the forgotten Awesome. Over the course of a year, I put it all together here.
Each week I did a main "Weekly Reading" post that was a read-through of that issue. I followed that up with a couple of other posts about topics from that Weekly Reading or whatever else I came up with to talk about. You'll find the lost Youngbloods in the Youngblood section and the fan-edit of the last Supreme in After Awesome.
Below is the archive of posts broken up by book. Thanks for checking the site out!
Book 1: Supreme: The Story of the Year
Book 1: Judgment Day
Book 3: Supreme: The Return
Book 4: Youngblood
Book 5: Glory
Book 6: After Awesome
Book 7: 1963
Book 8: Night Raven
Book 9: A Small Killing
Saturday, July 13, 2019
New custom Supreme/Awesome hardcovers - parts 1 & 2
Presenting the ultimate Supreme hardcover set!
These two hardcovers feature all of the published issues and my imaginary conclusion fan-edit of Supreme 64! It also includes loads of extras, such as rare interviews with Moore, Veitch, Sprouse; tons of rare and unpublished art; a fold-out poster; and scripts for two issues! Issue 41 is signed by Moore and 53 is signed by Chris Sprouse (sorry slabbers who now think I ruined the value of those issues)!
The covers are from a painting by Alex Ross! I even made a slipcase with another Alex Ross painting to keep the books nice and safe. Let me know what you think and stay tuned for more books to come!
Tuesday, May 21, 2019
A Small Killing - closing arguments
So, we've pretty well covered almost every panel in the book. What's left?Well, let's put A Small Killing in context. First off, let's start off with the negatives. While a fair number of Moore fans have never even bothered reading A Small Killing, many who have don't rate it very highly. The complaints are kind of obvious:
- The art is ugly.
- The main character is unlikable.
- Not much happens.
- The stuff that does happen is so ludicrous, it can't be taken seriously.
- It's all too symbolic.
- Where are the superheroes?
"Timothy Hole is unlikable." That's the point. But he also has his moments. I can understand not caring about the midlife crisis of an English yuppie, but I also think we're supposed to see our own worst tendencies in Hole. I know I do.
"Not much happens." Yeah, that whole car crash, London brawl and giant bottle of bugs spilling out and all over Hole sure were boring weren't they? But yes, a lot of it is a man going on vacation and worrying that he's being stalked by a boy. "The stuff that happens is ludicrous." True, the fetus thing seems to be a sticking point for a lot of people (Hi, PeteDratt of reddit.com/r/AlanMoore). Is it realistic? No, probably not. Does it work in the context of the death/life thing of the story? I think so. Again, this one is up to you.
"Too symbolic." Yes, this book is overloaded with symbols. Are they all necessary? No, probably not, but Moore was eager to prove he could take the lessons learned on Watchmen and turn them to a more artistic and adult work. That's interesting to me.
"Where are the superheroes?" Shut up.
I guess what I'm saying is that I think most of the complaints are well founded (except the superhero thing) and I don't disagree with the people who find that they hold them back from liking or getting into this work. But I think the strengths of the book outweigh the weaknesses.
The one that sticks with me is that Timothy Hole is unlikable. And I think that will lead through the rest of this post. I think Timothy was supposed to be so unlikable because Moore was using him as a sort of mirror for himself and some of the aspects he didn't like about himself.
The clues to this are kind of obvious.Moore wrote the years and locations for each of his chapters, corresponding to when Timothy was in those locations. So, Timothy was working in New York from 1985-1989. Those years roughly correspond to the same years Alan Moore worked at DC Comics. Moore started with Swamp Thing in 1984 and V for Vendetta finished in 1989. Timothy worked in London from 1979-1985, roughly the same years Alan Moore worked on mainstream British comics. Moore started Captain Britain in 1980 and finished Book 3 of Halo Jones in 1986. Timothy was born in 1954. Moore was born in 1953.
Sheffield is not Northampton, but in the Avatar edition, Moore notes that Zarate used the landscape of Northampton, including the lot where Moore's boyhood house once stood, for drawing the Sheffield and Old Buildings chapters. It's Moore's home.
![]() |
| Moore standing in the empty lot |
Moore was writing about his career. But the advertising was a stand-in for superhero comics. Remember the line about New York being Timothy's "peculiar mood I flew out of." When Moore was writing the ABC line of comics in the early 2000s, he talked about his 80s work:
"The apocalyptic bleakness of comics over the past 15 years sometimes seems odd to me, because it's like that was a bad mood that I was in 15 years ago. It was the 1980s, we'd got this insane right-wing voter fear running the country, and I was in a bad mood, politically and socially and in most other ways. So that tended to reflect in my work. But it was a genuine bad mood, and it was mine. I tend to think that I've seen a lot of things over the past 15 years that have been a bizarre echo of somebody else's bad mood. It's not even their bad mood, it's mine, but they're still working out the ramifications of me being a bit grumpy 15 years ago.”
Timothy had been hired by Flite or an advertising company to work on Flite from 1985 on. And now he had to sell Flite to the Russians, a new market. But what is Flite? Does it help if I spell it Flight? I think Flite, the soda, is superheroes with their powers, such as flight.
The Russians are a new audience, wary of this sugary concoction. Perhaps the Russians are the new adult audience the comic marketers made such a big deal about after Moore created Watchmen and Frank Miller created Dark Knight Returns?In this theory (which was written about pretty well here, well before I started my reread) , the opportunity to sell Flite is likely the opportunity to do The Twilight of the Superheroes, the crossover designed to affect all of the DC superhero comics. (I don't want to get into the Twilight proposal, so just go Google it, okay?) Suffice it to say, Moore could probably have done whatever he wanted at DC after Watchmen.
If Flite is DC superheroes, what does that say about the London work? Well, what's the comic that most got Moore noticed to go work in America? That would be Marvelman (or Miracleman). He had reinvented superheroes, adding psychology and real-world ramifications. And the American industry took notice. Remember when Timothy talked about his target audience: young, single, white males, earning between 10 and 15 grand? That's the same audience for comics.
So, remember that terrible ad, where the cars were chasing the woman?
I think that's Moore's view of his Marvelman work.
One more thing since we're on the subject of Moore's British comics. Remember when Timothy thinks about how being 10 is when you first start knowingly doing wrong. Moore wrote something similar in his Night Raven work in the back-up MarvelUK feature:
"Ten was a good age. Maybe the last good age. It was the age when parents stopped worrying about what other people might do to their kids, given the chance, and started worrying about what their kids might do to themselves."
But, let's be careful. Timothy is obviously not a complete stand-in for Moore in all aspects. Moore never cheated on his wife, as far as we know. He had kids and Timothy didn't. Moore never left Northampton. So let's not go too far in trying to make the two line up. I think Moore was focusing on his professional life and the clues seem to suggest that, so that's where I think the comparisons should stay.
Anyway, following this line of argument, what we know is that by the time Moore was writing A Small Killing he likely was tired of writing superheroes. He felt like he was selling soda for a major U.S. corporation. Probably, he felt like he had sold his soul for success.
![]() |
| I can't imagine where he got that idea |
Let's look at the timeline:
- Watchmen comes out in 1987-88
- Moore proposes Twilight of the Superheroes in 1987
- A Killing Joke comes out in May 1988
- Moore puts together the artists for his A.A.R.G.H. one-shot and it comes out in october of 1988. As part of that, he tells Zarate he wants to work on other things and Zarate tells him his idea about the boy stalking the man.
- V for Vendetta finishes in May 1989 and Moore knows that he already knows he's been screwed by the Watchmen and V for Vendetta deals and has sworn off DC (for other reasons, too).
- From Hell is previewed in Cerebus in July 1989.
- Big Numbers appear in April and September of 1990
- Lost Girls and A Small Killing appear in 1991
A Small Killing is the symbolic work representing Moore's turn away from DC superheroes to his work on creator-owned and less mainstream "more adult" work.At the end, when Timothy decides to stay in Sheffield is Moore deciding to stay and focus on personal work, such as his hometown of Northampton, which became a major part of his later work.
I think this is all pretty clear and it's a pretty sound argument. But, if you'll join me, I'll take it a step too far and hopefully we won't fall off a cliff.
What if the ending of A Small Killing is not just about working on DC Comics? What if it's a personal decision Moore made to change his outlook on life? Remember that foul mood he talked about?
My thesis is this (and it's the thesis for most of the work I've done on this blog), what if Moore made a conscious choice to change his attitude and his life? What if he decided to change his view from the pessimism and nihilism that marks his work on Watchmen and The Killing Joke?
Granted, his work on From Hell and Big Numbers were both filled with evil forces. But he also loved working on them and they were more important to him than his DC work. Nowadays he won't even talk about work he doesn't own.
But let's go back to the timeline.
- In the early 1990s, his wife (and her lover) leave him.
- Big Numbers dies twice, first by Bill Sienkiewicz leaving and then by Al Columbia physically destroying the art for issue 4.
- With these two acts, Mad Love, Moore's imprint (that put out A.A.R.G.H. and was associated with A Small Killing) goes bust
- By 1993, Moore returned to superhero comics with 1963 and his issue (and later issues) of Spawn for Image, largely to make money while working on From Hell
- He works on Spawn and WildCATS through 1995
- He did Outbreaks of Violets for the MTV Europe Awards in 1995
- He takes over Supreme in 1996, which leads to the revamp of the whole Awesome line. When Awesome went belly up in 1998, he went on to create ABC
Then came Supreme, Moore's love letter to the superheroes of his youth. I've written a lot about why Supreme is important to me, but for the sake of this, let me point out how far Moore had come. In A Small Killing we can make an argument that Moore had come to hate superheroes and left them to work on important comics and to find his truth. That ends in triple tragedy and he comes crawling back to superhero comics mainly for the money. But he's found his center. He's found the optimism and joy he enjoyed as a child. And through that optimism and joy he's found a way to love superheroes and make them optimistic and an ode to the imagination.
So, no matter all the complaints about A Small Killing and how reasonable they are, it's also the work at the crux of Moore's career that explains everything that came before and everything that came after.
And if that's still not enough for you to realize it is a major Moore work, Tim Callahan in his wonderful "Great Alan Moore Reread" said this about A Small Killing:
"The most highly-regarded 'literary' graphic novels of all time, name whatever famous Top 5 pops into your head, are almost sure to be memoirs, presented in an overly-literal, likely chronological order. Maus, Persepolis, or Fun Home. Something like that. Or, on the other end of things, formal masterpieces that are difficult to connect with emotionally. Jimmy Corrigan? Ice Haven? Asterios Polyp? A Small Killing is that rare beast of a fiction graphic novel that steals from what prose, poetry, and film can do, but tells the story as only comic books can. It’s as good as any of the other books listed above, and yet I’ve never seen it mentioned in the same sentence as any of the others.
"What a pleasure it was to reread this book by Alan Moore and Oscar Zarate. I can’t recommend it highly enough."
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I rest my case. How do you find the defendant?
Shameless plug
Interested to see what else I've got going? A friend and I have created a comic book called Miskatonic High. Five teens take on H.P. Lovecraft’s monsters and their small-town high school … They’re just not sure which is worse.
We successfully launched our first issue on kickstarter, which you can buy (PDF or physical copy) from here. It has received plenty of rave reviews:
Jenn Marshall of Sirens of Sequentials said: “Miskatonic High is a fun story that balances everything you want in a
good horror story. There is some gore, but not so much that you get
overwhelmed. The jokes are funny, but they don’t make the story feel
like a parody of something else. It was well thought out, and I cannot
wait to see where it is going to go next.” Read the full reviewThe Pullbox called it “the bastard lovechild of John Hughes & H.P. Lovecraft.” (We’re pretty sure they meant that in a metaphorical way, because if that’s literal, well… ewww.) Read the full review
Our kickstarter for issue two ended successfully and we'll be selling the issue from our website really soon.
Goshdarn Geeky raved of issue 2: "Miskatonic High has proven it can hit us right in the heart with a character-centric story that goes past the cosmic horror, and I hope it can continue to deliver." Read the full review
If you've got a few bucks to spare, give it a try. Thanks!
Friday, May 17, 2019
A Small Killing - chapter 4
To start off, we get the chapter page which tells us we're now in The Old Buildings. We're covering the period of 1954 to 1964, the first ten years of Timothy's life. We see Timothy's back at the top of a hill on his way down into a section of old lower-class English row houses. He's riding his father's bike, and the shadows and silhouettes of the barren trees seem to be reaching out for him.I've never really understood what Zarate is doing with the styles on these chapter headings. The first two were bright and colorful and then the third was stark black and white and now this moody one that doesn't look much different from the rest of the story. Is there a meaning in all this or did he just do whatever he wanted on the day?
As he's biking, he thinks, "through this scrapyard of clapped-out utopias; failed social visions that came here to die. Just like me..." Moore would explore this psychic geography a lot in his later writings on Northampton, but it's enough to know that he's returning to his very low-class roots."How on Earth did I come to be here?" he thinks, but what does he mean? Why is he here now and how did he get brought here by his subconscious? Or how did a boy from such lower class ever get out of here to London and New York?
He blames it on the bike, which his dad rode here for 12 years. It carried him here. "I'm being ridden by the bike," he thinks, because nothing is his fault.
He thinks, "I feel as if I'm treading darkness...trying to push my head above the surface of this night, but failing...going down..." That's a beautiful line. He's drowning in the night.
He thinks about being a kid and pretending to walk on a tightrope on the curb. Moore has always been so good at capturing the memory of youth. "The present's less substantial here." The memories of the past are coming to him here as he's in this place. He's being drawn back here to remember something. "It's where he lives," he thinks of his 10-year-old self.
He thinks about wanting to live and whether that means meeting the boy or killing him. And then he sees a kid, but it isn't young Timothy, it's Maggie with her own children. And she's happy to see him."God, you're looking smart. You look like a yuppie." She introduces him to her two little kids. Remember that they didn't have kids when they were married but since he left she's been able to. So this kind of confirms that the problem of having kids wasn't her biological problem, but his. Everything he produces is dead.
She tells him that she lives down here but is moving now that her handmade toy company is taking off. She stuck to her ideals. She tells him that she has to go and see her husband. "Lovely seeing you," she says. "You take care of yourself." She holds no animosity toward him. No one does, really. Only young Timothy.
(By the way, she's wearing glasses, so maybe her eyesight was bad all along? Or maybe she's on her own way toward becoming a yuppie and she can't see clearly anymore, either?)
But he's not sure what to make of the chance meeting, thinking that maybe he's dreaming or maybe he's dead. I guess those are potential answers to this story, but they're kind of a chicken way to rationalize this story, so I'm not going to think too much about them.
He keeps heading toward his old house, seeing one that wasn't his, but it represents so much to him. "If I entered, every toy I ever lost would be there, in the starlight and the mildew." The house is his subconscious, holding all that he's lost. But his house is gone, demolished, nothing but grass.And as he looks at the yard, he hears voices, even though no one is there. They're the voices of children, probably from his own youth. Up until this point in the book, we've always heard the voices in crowds of people, but where Timothy was separate from them in his own world of thought. The voices were part of the setting, part of the place, helping us to feel what New York was like or what the pub in Sheffield was like.
But what do the voices mean here? Are they ghosts? Are they his subconscious? Are they part of the remnant of human memory that have been stamped onto a place? I think any of those are an okay answer. For me, I think it shows that the sights and sounds of his memory are becoming very real and substantial to him, even where his outside senses are picking them up. He is physically hearing his memory. Soon, he'll physically feel it too.
He moves on from his house to "the old buildings," where he'd played as a child. And he thinks about the time he had put the live bugs in the bottle and buried them. The art zooms in on his little smiling face. "I buried them alive, like little Eichmann. It felt...sexy." Sex/puberty is a dividing point for when a child becomes an adult (or at least a young adult if you go by the sections of the library).He looks at where he stopped and made up his mind about returning to free the bugs. The captions of his thoughts tell us that he returned to free the insects, but the art shows us that he didn't. Then he stops and realizes that he didn't. That his memory was a lie he told himself.
"I couldn't face it, sickened with myself." And he runs into the wasteland of the old buildings, Zarate beautifully showing the building like partially submerged wreckage. "It was the first bad thing that I did knowingly. The first." But not the last, as we've seen.He thinks about how people change, from being the young innocent Lolita, deciding to play grown up, and then being the grown up Humbert Humbert filled with bad intentions toward the child.
He finds the spot and starts digging, hoping it's not there and that he really did dig it up in the past. But then it's there, glowing unearthly and so much bigger than when he was a kid. It's grown from all the lies and terrible things he did after burying it.He decides to open it. "There. There," he thinks of the lid, "it's giving..." Is it giving way or giving birth?
This reminds me, I think intentionally, of the myth of Pandora's box. He's letting all the evils out, just as Pandora did. But in the myth, Pandora shuts the box, trapping one of the evils in, that last one being hope. I've always enjoyed the little conundrum of why hope is sometimes considered an evil, though I don't think that part applies here.
Then we see a splash page of the giant terrible insects climbing out and all over Timothy. It's so incredibly well drawn by Zarate. It's creepy and gross and magical. And notice that Timothy is not wearing his glasses now. His eyes are wide with fright, but he sees.Then he's throwing up as the glasses return. And that's when the boy finds him.
He asks what the boy wants and he says to kill the adult. When asked why, he responds, "You killed me first," and picks up a club-like stick.
The adult tries to apologize to the boy, but the boy isn't here for an apology. Notice that the adult apologizes with his eyes closed. Is he even sorry, really, or is he just avoiding his guilt? Is there any truth to this apology?It doesn't matter, the boy hits the man, knocking him back into the hole that is his namesake, and knocking off his glasses. Finally clear about what story he's in, the adult grabs a sharp piece of glass and squares off with the kid. And the adult has his inspiration, born of this conflict.
The idea is: In Red Square a boy will be drinking Flite while his grandfather looks up at the disapproving image of Lenin. Flite doesn't mean anything to the boy because he's untroubled by the past. The grandfather, hot and thirsty, glances up guiltily, perhaps letting the past stop him from what he really wants.
And the two Timothies continue fighting. We pull farther and farther away and Timothy thinks of the dream and how they could have been anyone. "It happened, and I was away in the distance." And we see the crash of lightning from the dream strike the two.I'm not sure who the "I" was away in the distance. Is it just a thought from the adult Timothy? Or is some third Timothy watching as this adult version and child version battle it out? Is it like Don't Look Back, where the main character has visions of his own demise? Or is it me, Mike, reading this comic? I'm not sure.
Then we see the bike in the dark, which looks like a pair of glasses. And then we see the light of morning glint off a wheel. And then we see the light glint off of Timothy's glasses. Then we see the adult Timothy wake up next to his glasses but never put them on and walk away from them, obviously able to see clearly without them now.A bird flies up and will soon become a symbol for how the world has changed as we're no longer talking about dead eggs.
We've gone through the darkness of night and soul and have come out the other end, like Dante in the Inferno having to go through the deepest depth of Hell to come out.
Timothy walks into a shop and gets a paper and a can of Vimto, the only one on a shelf full of Flite. He talks to the old woman clerk, and I feel like maybe she's a counterpoint to the phony cheery stewardess we saw at the beginning of the book. And we see him looking at the section of the paper that says "Situations wanted." (Situations wanted is like a help wanted section, except you say what you can do and hope someone hires you.) And then there's that bird again.
I've hear people tell me that the ending is meant ambiguously, and we're not sure who won or what happened, but to me it seems obvious who won. We're supposed to think that the boy Timothy, who represents honesty to oneself, has won and that this new Timothy will be staying in his hometown, drinking Vimto and leading a new life.He thinks, "There's a new yolk in the blown egg. There's a new pulse in the scraped womb. Everything is pregnant." And we see the bird with a nest of three eggs. Where Timothy only produced death, he will now produce life.
And here's an important part of that. He can't go back and make a child with Maggie and he can't go back and undo the abortion with Sylvia. Just as he didn't go back in time to let the bugs out; he came back when he was older and tried to make amends. The only life he can produce right now is his own. He needed to make amends with himself. And now he's pregnant with his own future.
There's also the question of if the lie about killing the bugs was the point where his life spun off in the wrong direction, was all of it wrong? Wasn't his love of Maggie great and wasn't he an idealist for a little while? Yes, of course. No life is all bad or all good. But it was built on a foundation of him lying to himself, which is what sunk it. If he had been honest, would Maggie have married him? Who knows, but it would have been built on who Timothy really was rather than who he thought she wanted him to be and who he wanted to be.
But what about the boy? Was he real? I don't know. Does it matter? The simple answer is that no, he merely represented Timothy's subconscious, and it was all symbol and metaphors for a man wrestling with his soul and coming to a midlife crisis. If you prefer to think the boy was real, that works, too. In Moore's view, ideas are real whether they're physical or not. But you decide. Moore's not giving simple answers in this book.And Timothy walks off into the morning light, looking at his paper. Around him, we see a person on a bike, a cab, a train and a jet plane. All of these things are taking people elsewhere, but he's not going anywhere anymore.
And he thinks, "Into the morning, unnoticed, I slip from the scene of the crime." What's the crime? The bottling of the insects or the killing of the adult Timothy? I guess there's some ambiguity after all.Here's a little more ambiguity: On the final page, the one little sketch of an image shows us the nest. And one of the eggs is cracked. Is it something alive or is it something dead? We get to decide. Will Timothy become a new and better person or will he be the person he's always been? Can a person ever really change?
I hope he becomes the better person. Is hope still in the box or did he let it out?
What did you think about the ending?
I plan to do one more post about A Small Killing, so come back as we try to determine the motive!
Shameless plug
One more project I'm working on: A friend and I have created a comic book called Miskatonic High. Five teens take on H.P. Lovecraft’s monsters and their small-town high school … They’re just not sure which is worse.
We successfully launched our first kickstarter, which you can buy (PDF or physical copy of issue 1 so far) from here. It has received plenty of rave reviews:
Jenn Marshall of Sirens of Sequentials said: “Miskatonic High is a fun story that balances everything you want in a
good horror story. There is some gore, but not so much that you get
overwhelmed. The jokes are funny, but they don’t make the story feel
like a parody of something else. It was well thought out, and I cannot
wait to see where it is going to go next.” Read the full reviewThe Pullbox called it “the bastard lovechild of John Hughes & H.P. Lovecraft.” (We’re pretty sure they meant that in a metaphorical way, because if that’s literal, well… ewww.) Read the full review
Our kickstarter for issue two just ended. You can get the PDF of the second issue on ComixCentral.com real soon.
Goshdarn Geeky raved of issue 2: "Miskatonic High has proven it can hit us right in the heart with a character-centric story that goes past the cosmic horror, and I hope it can continue to deliver." Read the full review
























